I want very desperately to see what others have seen in this book. I reread it this month to find out if I had just missed things on first readings, if my frustrations and disappointments and distance would fade away on a second visit.
But no. I remain disappointed. I
continue to think that this book tries valiantly at something very
difficult and amazing, and fails. I am not grabbed by the characters.
Goodness knows I want to be. I loved The Dispossessed. Why don't I love this?
a very lonely feeling, to sit out feeling mediocre about a book that
has generated such raves and such love from other people. I want in on
So, why do I have problems with it? The issues are twofold:
I think she fails at portraying genderlessness. It's a very difficult
thing, I fully admit that! It might have been miraculous had she
succeeded. But to me, she never did. Instead, this book constantly read
(both times) to me, as a book about a planet full of men who
occasionally had babies. That would be interesting, if that was what she
was going for. But I don't think it was.
For every time she
added Genly saying something about how the person he was talking to was
somehow a bit like a woman, there are dozens and dozens of male
pronouns. And despite Genly's assertion that "he" is a gender neutral
term, I call bullshit. It isn't. It has never been. The gendered
assumptions packed up in such a tiny word may be unacknowledged, but
they exist. If "she" is a bearer of meaning that includes gendered
expectations, so is "he."
Every time someone has tried to come up
with a gender neutral pronoun, the results have tended to be inelegant
and strained. But I think that might be what she needed here. She could
have made up a Gethenian pronoun and used it, and that would have
brought the gender issue to the fore, instead of hiding it behind the
But even worse is the part where, even when perfectly good
gender-neutral words existed in English, LeGuin chose not to use them,
using instead the specifically male forms. Gethenians are not parents,
they are fathers. Their children are not children, they are sons.
Siblings are not siblings, they are brothers. Parents, children,
siblings. Why not those words?
Males who occasionally get pregnant.
will omit the part where every time someone first interacts with a
non-Gethenian person, whether as an image or the reality, the example
always starts with someone finding the female form strange and
offputting. It's going to be a bit repetitive, given what I've already
If LeGuin had just set this on a world that, instead of
genderless, was gendered entirely male, I wouldn't be having these
difficulties. It wouldn't have mattered if their masculinity was far
different from the ones I know. Masculinities are rarely constant and
never universal. I hoped beyond hope that I'd be swept up in the story
this time, that her use of pronouns and nouns would bother me quite so
much. It never happened.
2) Once the above started to get under
my skin, there wasn't enough emotional attachment to the characters or
the story to override it, and allow me to get immersed. It was too
restrained, too cerebral, and I never really cared very much about what
was going on.
The Dispossessed captured and held me. The Left Hand of Darkness
left me cold. I wanted to care about Genly, about Estraven, about their
world and their struggles. But whether it was my brain getting stuck on
pronouns and refusing to budge, or that there wasn't enough there for
me to grasp on to, I was adrift.
I didn't mind reading it. I
think it is a magnificent attempt at something incredibly difficult. But
for me, it never succeeded at its most basic premise, and there wasn't
enough else to become enraptured by.
I read this book as part of an attempt to read all the Hugo Nominees