*Spoilers Below* 
This book gets a solid "meh."  I didn't connect with it, never felt that
 it had anything deeper or meaningful to say about about life, about 
medicine, about family or children, and then, near the end, one thing 
made me enraged. I don't know what Ann Patchett was trying to achieve 
with this book, but I didn't get it. There was the surface layer, and 
then...?
Incredibly passive biomedical researcher Marina is 
gently nudged into travelling to Brazil in search of her former teacher,
 who is there allegedly developing an incredible drug to extend 
fertility for women indefinitely. Oh, and to look for information on the
 death of a colleague. Once there, she drifts vaguely into the orbit of 
her former teacher, Dr. Swenson, and taken along to her hidden camp. 
There, she...look, I don't know what she does. I mean, I know what 
happens in the story, but how it affects her? It's all very vague, and 
we aren't given enough to really know how she changes, other than that 
initially she finds the life icky and then doesn't. 
We don't really know anything about Marina except her passivity, so, wow, is it difficult to give a rat's ass about her. 
There
 could be something to be said here about biomedical ethics, about 
lifestyle, about anything, really. Instead, what seems to be chosen is a
 very shallow look at very deep issues.
Oh, and then the part that enraged me. Look, if she decides she can't 
go back to get the child she just left alone with a hostile tribe, and 
suffers guilt because of that, that would be one thing. But to give it 
some pseudophilosophical justification about how "people are only 
allowed to go into hell once" is fucking ridiculous. One, it wasn't 
hell, it was a traumatic experience. Two, people aren't goddamned 
limited to one, and then exempted from all future trauma. It's certainly
 not a a moral justification for inactivity. 
And
 then the book ends. And nothing is really changed, Marina may decide to
 go back to the Amazon camp, but I don't really care. I don't think she 
cares. She doesn't seem to have changed, or found meaning or purpose, or
 a backbone. I'm a little perplexed what the author was trying to do 
here, because I just didn't get it. At all.
 
No comments:
Post a Comment